One of the
things that has surprised me most in this week’s study of Wozzeck and the Secessionist art movement in Vienna is the extent to
which recognizable artistic tropes and traditions were used. I am used to
hearing about Schoenberg mainly in connection to the “emancipation of tonality”
and all his radical ideas about music theory and serialism. Partially this is
probably because I have been exposed to quite a lot more serial and otherwise unconventional
music since three years ago and my ear is growing used to it, but the
chronological proximity of the Secessionists to late Romantic composers like
Brahms stood out more than it has for me in the past.
Schoenberg was already in his
mid-twenties when Brahms died, and Berg and Webern were teenagers. I was
surprised to learn that Schoenberg’s view of Brahms was largely positive. Even
though Brahms was well-known for his more traditional approach to composition, observes
Schoenberg in Brahms the Progressive,
he often uses traditional idioms in forward-thinking ways. There is a direct
link between Brahms’s use of falling thirds in his Intermezzo and the basics of early atonal music. This idea of using
old methods to accomplish new goals is one of the most important principles of
the Secessionist movement. It crops up all over. Otto Wagner’s architecture is
ornate enough to resemble architecture from a century or more previously. Picasso
and Schoenberg himself both famously use Shakespearean commedia dell’arte stock characters, Picasso in many of his works
and Schoenberg most notably in Pierrot
Lunaire, a song cycle which includes a passacaglia, a fugue, and a number
of other classical forms.
Berg’s Wozzeck also uses many time-honored musical traditions to help
accomplish its 20th-century goals. The orchestration is full and
often very beautiful, especially during the interludes, where Berg gives the
music room to grow into recognizable high and low points, even if there is
little doubling of voice parts or musical cues for the singers during the
action of the opera. Berg also frequently includes brief passages of tonally-centered
music, such as the arrival in a comfortable A minor at the end of Marie’s
cradle song. Many of the characters are identified via musical motifs that
announce their presence or influence throughout the opera. The cradle song in
Act One resembles alternatively a lullaby (during its 3/4 sections) and a
driving German Lied (during its 6/8 sections). When the piece is in 3/4, the
orchestra moves slowly from chord to chord and the voice arpeggiates triads on
legato quarter notes. The 6/8 sections are much more rhythmically and
harmonically active in both orchestra and voice. These are all pretty
traditional moves, and illustrate not just Wozzeck’s
connection to the Secessionist movement, but also the Secessionist
movements ties to all the music that came before it.
Thank you for mentioning the "emancipation of tonality" in regard to Shoenberg and the emergence of serialist music. Certainly he as well as his students Berg and Webern were pioneers in this field of atonal music. What I do notice is that in this phrase that structure can still remain; rather than simply saying "emancipation of music," which could be interpreted as freedom from tonality, rhythm, harmony, and/or structure, the composition of a piece is still present, just without the idea of tonality, hence why the terms "passacaglia" can be applied to Berg's music in "Wozzeck." You are very right in saying that Berg's music is tied to the previous musical styles before him.
ReplyDeleteHi Sam,
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your over-arching point about how the Secessionist movement ties traditional ideas with new ideas, and how Wozzeck features the same idea of retaining traditional ideas while incorporating new ones... Correct me if I'm wrong! In particular, I found your second paragraph very persuasive.
Good, Sam--you bring together some good observations here, especially with regard to the proximity of Brahms' music to the Second Viennese School. Your last point about the connection of Secessionist art to "all" that preceded is a little overstated, but your point is taken.
ReplyDelete